{"id":398,"date":"2026-08-20T07:37:45","date_gmt":"2026-08-20T07:37:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/?p=398"},"modified":"2026-08-20T07:37:47","modified_gmt":"2026-08-20T07:37:47","slug":"best-ai-model-for-research","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/best-ai-model-for-research","title":{"rendered":"Best AI Model for Research: Research Protocol v1 (Retrieve, Draft, Adversarial Check)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"i10x-article\">\n\n<p class=\"i10x-pill\">Guide \u00b7 August 2026<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"i10x-lead\">\nThe best AI model for research is not a single chat brand. It is a <strong>workflow<\/strong>: retrieve sources, draft under constraints, then run an adversarial check on claims and citations. This guide defines multi-model AI versus multimodal AI, compares research-native tools (for example Perplexity-class search assistants) against general LLMs and multi-model workspaces, and ships a fully specified <strong>Research Protocol v1<\/strong> you can run today. For the cluster hub, start at\n<a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/multi-model-ai\">multi-model AI<\/a>.\nTo run research jobs across models in one workspace, open\n<a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">i10X<\/a>.\n<\/p>\n\n<div class=\"i10x-highlight-stats\">\n<table class=\"i10x-table\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><p>3 steps<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Research Protocol v1: retrieve \u2192 draft \u2192 adversarial check<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p>42 pp<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Max hire-rate gap by AI writing style alone (i10X Research, June 2026; proof that model and style choice change outcomes)<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p>1,576<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Valid multi-model evaluation points in the i10X CV study (100 profiles)<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p>29 pts<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Largest single-evaluator score gap on identical qualifications (i10X Research)<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p>Portfolio<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Gartner (Mar 2026): orchestrate a model portfolio; route routine work to smaller models<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n<hr>\n\n<h2 id=\"multi-model-vs-multimodal\">Multi-model vs multimodal (read this first)<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Multi-model AI<\/strong> means using more than one language model or provider on the same task (for example Claude, GPT-class, Gemini-class, or open-weight models) so you can compare outputs, route by cost, or catch disagreements. <strong>Multimodal AI<\/strong> means one system that accepts or produces more than one media type (text, image, audio, video). This article is about multi-model research workflows. Multimodal tools can help when your sources include screenshots or PDFs, but they do not replace a second model\u2019s independent critique of your claims.<\/p>\n<p>If you only remember one distinction: multi-model is about <em>who thinks<\/em>; multimodal is about <em>what media enters the prompt<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n<hr>\n\n<h2 id=\"what-best-ai-for-research-actually-means\">What \u201cbest AI for research\u201d actually means<\/h2>\n<p>Search results for \u201cbest AI model for research\u201d often rank product reviews that treat research as one chat session with nice formatting. Serious research is a chain of jobs:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Discovery:<\/strong> find primary sources, papers, filings, standards, and expert commentary.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Compression:<\/strong> turn long sources into structured notes without inventing numbers.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Synthesis:<\/strong> write a coherent draft under a question and a scope.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Verification:<\/strong> check claims, quotes, URLs, and logic against sources.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Decision support:<\/strong> surface uncertainty, alternatives, and what would change the conclusion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>No single model wins every step. Research-native assistants often excel at discovery with links. General frontier models often excel at synthesis and long-context reasoning. Multi-model setups win when the cost of a wrong claim is high: compliance memos, investor research, competitive diligence, medical-adjacent literature scans (with qualified humans), policy briefs, and technical RFCs.<\/p>\n<p>i10X Research\u2019s own multi-model evaluation work (up to a <strong>42 percentage-point<\/strong> hire-rate gap by resume writing style, <strong>1,576<\/strong> valid data points, <strong>100<\/strong> profiles, largest single-evaluator gap of <strong>29 points<\/strong>) is hiring-domain proof that model choice and presentation change outcomes. Full write-up:\n<a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/ai-cv-bias\">AI CV bias study<\/a>.\nThe research lesson is the same: do not treat one model\u2019s confident paragraph as ground truth.<\/p>\n\n<hr>\n\n<h2 id=\"research-protocol-v1\">Magnet asset: Research Protocol v1<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Research Protocol v1<\/strong> is a named operating standard: fixed stages, fixed outputs, and a ban on inventing statistics. Cite \u201cResearch Protocol v1\u201d in team docs so analysts use the same chain.<\/p>\n\n<h3 id=\"protocol-overview\">Protocol overview (R0-R5)<\/h3>\n<table class=\"i10x-table\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th><p>Step<\/p><\/th>\n<th><p>Action<\/p><\/th>\n<th><p>Owner<\/p><\/th>\n<th><p>Output<\/p><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p><strong>R0. Lock the question<\/strong><\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Write the decision, audience, time horizon, and non-goals<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Analyst \/ requester<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>One-page research brief<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p><strong>R1. Retrieve<\/strong><\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Collect primary sources with URLs, dates, and access notes<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Research-native tool + human<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Source pack (min. 5-12 items for serious briefs)<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p><strong>R2. Structure notes<\/strong><\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Extract claims with page\/section anchors; mark confidence<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>General LLM on source text<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Claim table, not prose yet<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p><strong>R3. Draft<\/strong><\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Answer only from the claim table + allowed external facts<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Strong general model<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Draft with inline source IDs<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p><strong>R4. Adversarial check<\/strong><\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Second model attacks claims, missing counterevidence, and fake citations<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Different model family if possible<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Attack list + severity<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p><strong>R5. Human gate<\/strong><\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Resolve high-severity issues; approve external share<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Named human<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Versioned brief + change log<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n<h3 id=\"r1-retrieve-rules\">R1 retrieve rules (citations honesty starts here)<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Prefer primary sources over blog summaries of primary sources.<\/li>\n<li>Capture publisher, date, URL, and whether paywalled.<\/li>\n<li>Tag each source: primary \/ secondary \/ vendor marketing \/ social.<\/li>\n<li>If a tool returns a citation you cannot open, mark it <strong>unverified<\/strong> and do not promote it to a hard claim.<\/li>\n<li>Never ask a model to \u201cinvent plausible sources\u201d to make a draft look cited.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h3 id=\"r3-draft-rules\">R3 draft rules<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Every quantitative claim needs a source ID or an explicit \u201cestimate \/ unknown\u201d label.<\/li>\n<li>Separate <em>what sources say<\/em> from <em>what we infer<\/em>.<\/li>\n<li>Ban invented percentages, market sizes, and \u201cstudies show\u201d without a named study.<\/li>\n<li>For i10X internal facts, only reuse published figures (for example the bias study numbers above).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h3 id=\"r4-adversarial-check\">R4 adversarial check (the multi-model heart)<\/h3>\n<p>Run a second model (or a strict \u201cauditor\u201d prompt on a different provider) with this job:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>List claims that lack sources.<\/li>\n<li>List claims that overstate the source.<\/li>\n<li>List alternative explanations the draft ignored.<\/li>\n<li>Flag any URL or paper title that looks fabricated or incomplete.<\/li>\n<li>Score overall risk: low \/ medium \/ high for publishing externally.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Disagreement between draft model and auditor model is a feature. Resolve it in R5, not by averaging vibes. For a full disagreement playbook outside research, see\n<a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/side-by-side-ai-comparison\">side-by-side AI comparison<\/a>\nand\n<a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/multi-model-hallucination-checks\">multi-model hallucination checks<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n<hr>\n\n<h2 id=\"perplexity-vs-general-llm-vs-multi-model\">Perplexity-class tools vs general LLMs vs multi-model workspaces<\/h2>\n<p>These categories solve different research jobs. Treating them as interchangeable is how teams get fast drafts with weak sources.<\/p>\n\n<table class=\"i10x-table\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th><p>Category<\/p><\/th>\n<th><p>Typical strength<\/p><\/th>\n<th><p>Typical weakness<\/p><\/th>\n<th><p>Best use in Protocol v1<\/p><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p><strong>Research-native \/ answer engines<\/strong> (Perplexity-class and similar)<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Fast web retrieval, linked answers, good for orientation<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Can over-trust secondary pages; citation quality varies by query<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>R1 discovery and first source pack<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p><strong>General frontier LLMs<\/strong> (ChatGPT \/ Claude \/ Gemini-class chats)<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Long synthesis, reasoning, rewriting for audience<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>May invent citations if not grounded; training cutoff and tool use vary<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>R2-R3 notes and draft when fed real sources<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p><strong>Multi-model platforms \/ workspaces<\/strong> (aggregators, routers, superagent-style tools)<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Same prompt across models; routing; shared context<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Requires method or you only collect conflicting chat logs<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>R3 + R4 side by side; portfolio routing per Gartner\u2019s orchestration theme<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p><strong>API \/ OpenRouter-class routing<\/strong><\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Programmatic panels, cost control, model IDs logged<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>More engineering; not a polished research UI alone<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Teams that need audit logs and automation<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n<h3 id=\"when-perplexity-class-wins\">When research-native tools win<\/h3>\n<p>Use them when you need orientation on a new domain in under an hour: competitor landscape, regulation timelines, \u201cwho publishes on X,\u201d or a first reading list. Always open the top links yourself for claims that will appear in an external document.<\/p>\n\n<h3 id=\"when-general-llms-win\">When general LLMs win<\/h3>\n<p>Use them when you already have PDFs, transcripts, or a source pack and need structure: outlines, claim tables, executive summaries, and stakeholder-specific rewrites. Paste or attach sources. Do not rely on the model\u2019s memory for statistics you will publish.<\/p>\n\n<h3 id=\"when-multi-model-wins\">When multi-model wins<\/h3>\n<p>Use multi-model when:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The brief will influence money, legal posture, hiring, or public reputation.<\/li>\n<li>Two analysts disagree and you need structured second opinions.<\/li>\n<li>You are building a repeatable research function, not a one-off chat.<\/li>\n<li>You want cost routing: cheap models for retrieval summaries, stronger models for final synthesis (aligned with Gartner\u2019s March 2026 theme of <strong>portfolio orchestration<\/strong> and routing routine work to smaller models).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Platform category map for 2026 (features, not invented prices):\n<a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/best-multi-model-ai-platforms-2026\">best multi-model AI platforms 2026<\/a>.\nStack cost math:\n<a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/ai-subscription-stack-cost\">AI subscription stack cost<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n<hr>\n\n<h2 id=\"citation-honesty-playbook\">Citation honesty playbook<\/h2>\n<p>AI research fails most often not on prose quality but on <strong>citation theater<\/strong>: footnotes that look academic while pointing to the wrong page, a dead link, or nothing at all.<\/p>\n\n<div class=\"i10x-callout\">\n<strong>Hard rules for citation honesty<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>If you did not open it, do not cite it as verified.<\/li>\n<li>If the model quotes a paper, confirm title, authors, and year against a real database or publisher page.<\/li>\n<li>Vendor blogs are sources about the vendor\u2019s claims, not independent validation.<\/li>\n<li>Social posts are leads, not evidence, unless the author is the primary source (for example an official account posting a primary number with a link).<\/li>\n<li>When uncertain, write \u201cwe could not verify\u201d instead of a fake precision.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n<h3 id=\"claim-table-template\">Claim table template (copy this)<\/h3>\n<table class=\"i10x-table\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th><p>Claim ID<\/p><\/th>\n<th><p>Claim text<\/p><\/th>\n<th><p>Source ID<\/p><\/th>\n<th><p>Quote \/ location<\/p><\/th>\n<th><p>Confidence<\/p><\/th>\n<th><p>Adversarial note<\/p><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p>C1<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>\u2026<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>S3<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>URL + section<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>High \/ med \/ low<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Empty until R4<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Drafts that cannot map paragraphs back to claim IDs are not ready for external review.<\/p>\n\n<hr>\n\n<h2 id=\"task-fit-matrix\">Task-fit matrix: which model class for which research job<\/h2>\n<table class=\"i10x-table\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th><p>Research job<\/p><\/th>\n<th><p>Default first tool<\/p><\/th>\n<th><p>Second pass<\/p><\/th>\n<th><p>Human required?<\/p><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p>Orient on a new topic<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Research-native search<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>General LLM to cluster themes<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Skim top sources<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p>Literature-style scan<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Scholarly databases + research-native<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>General LLM claim table<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Yes on inclusion criteria<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p>Competitive diligence<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Primary filings + product pages<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Multi-model adversarial check<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Yes before share<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p>Policy \/ regulatory brief<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Official text of laws and agency pages<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Auditor model for overclaim<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Counsel for legal conclusions<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p>Technical design research<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Docs, RFCs, code<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Second model for edge cases<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Engineer review<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p>Market sizing<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Named analyst or primary data only<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Adversarial model on assumptions<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Yes; ban invented TAM<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p>Internal ops research<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Your data exports<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Smaller model for first pass summaries<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Owner of the metric<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Gartner\u2019s March 2026 guidance on <strong>portfolio orchestration<\/strong> fits this matrix: do not burn a frontier model on every retrieval summary. Route routine compression to smaller or cheaper models; reserve stronger models for synthesis and adversarial review.<\/p>\n\n<hr>\n\n<h2 id=\"worked-example-research-protocol\">Worked example: Research Protocol v1 on a product decision<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Brief (R0).<\/strong> Should a B2B team add a multi-model comparison feature to their AI workspace in the next quarter? Audience: product and finance. Non-goals: full vendor RFP.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Retrieve (R1).<\/strong> Source pack includes: public product category pages for multi-model platforms, Gartner-style industry commentary on model portfolios (Mar 2026 orchestration theme), internal support tickets about \u201cwhich model is best,\u201d and the i10X cluster hub on\n<a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/multi-model-ai\">multi-model AI<\/a>.\nNo invented user percentages.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Notes (R2).<\/strong> Claim table separates \u201cusers ask for model choice\u201d (internal tickets) from \u201cindustry expects multi-model portfolios\u201d (external theme) from \u201cour conversion impact\u201d (unknown until pilot).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Draft (R3).<\/strong> Recommendation: ship a 14-day pilot of side-by-side comparison for research and writing tasks, measure time-to-approved-brief, not vanity chat counts.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Adversarial (R4).<\/strong> Second model attacks: selection bias in support tickets; risk that multi-model confuses less technical users; cost of dual inference; need for disagreement rules (link to\n<a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/side-by-side-ai-comparison\">scorecard method<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Human gate (R5).<\/strong> Product owner accepts pilot with success metrics; finance requires live pricing verification for any third-party model access (see stack cost article).<\/p>\n\n<hr>\n\n<h2 id=\"prompts-for-research-protocol\">Prompts that respect Research Protocol v1<\/h2>\n<p>Use short, versioned prompts. Store them next to the brief.<\/p>\n\n<h3 id=\"retrieve-prompt\">Retrieve assistant prompt (orientation only)<\/h3>\n<p><em>\u201cList 8-12 sources for [question]. Prefer primary documents. For each: title, publisher, date, URL, why relevant, and risk of bias. Do not invent URLs. If unsure a source exists, omit it.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n<h3 id=\"claim-table-prompt\">Claim table prompt<\/h3>\n<p><em>\u201cUsing only the pasted sources, fill a claim table: claim, source ID, quote or section, confidence. If a number is not in the sources, write UNKNOWN. Do not add outside statistics.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n<h3 id=\"draft-prompt\">Draft prompt<\/h3>\n<p><em>\u201cWrite a research brief for [audience] answering [question]. Use only claim IDs from the table. Label inferences clearly. End with open questions and what evidence would change the recommendation.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n<h3 id=\"adversarial-prompt\">Adversarial prompt (different model)<\/h3>\n<p><em>\u201cYou are an adversarial reviewer. Attack this draft. List: (1) unsupported claims, (2) overstated sources, (3) missing counterevidence, (4) citation problems, (5) decision risks if published. Severity: high\/med\/low. Do not rewrite the whole draft.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n<hr>\n\n<h2 id=\"team-operating-model\">Team operating model for AI research<\/h2>\n<p>Individual power users can run Protocol v1 in two tabs. Teams need owners:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Brief owner:<\/strong> locks R0 and accepts R5.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Source librarian:<\/strong> maintains templates for source packs and citation style.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Model steward:<\/strong> documents which models are allowed for which step and keeps IDs\/versions.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Risk reviewer:<\/strong> required for external or regulated content.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>LinkedIn\u2019s Future of Recruiting research finds TA professionals using gen AI report about <strong>20% of their workweek saved on average<\/strong>. That productivity context applies when research is part of hiring or GTM work: reinvest saved hours into verification (R4-R5), not into more unverified drafts.<\/p>\n<p>Enterprise agent programs still show a wide experiment-to-scale gap (McKinsey 62% \/ 23% baseline; Gartner 2026 CIO survey 17% deployed agents; IBM June 2026 11% fully ready). Context and charts:\n<a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/ai-agents-experiment-vs-scale\">AI agents experiment vs scale<\/a>.\nResearch agents fail for the same reason production agents fail: weak gates and no system of work.<\/p>\n\n<hr>\n\n<h2 id=\"failure-modes\">Failure modes in AI-assisted research<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>One-shot answer syndrome:<\/strong> asking \u201cwhat is the market size\u201d and pasting a single model reply into a deck.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Citation theater:<\/strong> footnotes without openable sources.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Homogeneous multi-model:<\/strong> two UIs wrapping the same base model; fake independence.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Context amnesia:<\/strong> each chat loses the claim table; conclusions drift.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Scope creep:<\/strong> model invents adjacent topics that sound smart but were not requested.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Over-trusting retrieval:<\/strong> top search results are SEO pages, not primary evidence.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Under-using humans:<\/strong> skipping R5 because the draft \u201csounds finished.\u201d<\/li>\n<li><strong>Secret stack:<\/strong> personal AI subscriptions holding client research with no retention policy (see\n<a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/ai-subscription-stack-cost\">subscription stack cost<\/a>).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<hr>\n\n<h2 id=\"metrics-for-research-quality\">Metrics for research quality (not vanity tokens)<\/h2>\n<table class=\"i10x-table\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th><p>Metric<\/p><\/th>\n<th><p>Why it matters<\/p><\/th>\n<th><p>Target pattern<\/p><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p>% claims with verified sources<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Core quality<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>High for external briefs<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p>Adversarial high-severity count<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Catches overclaim<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Trend down after prompt fixes<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p>Time to approved brief<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Speed with gates<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Faster than pure manual without quality drop<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p>Rework after stakeholder review<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Trust signal<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Fewer factual rewrites<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><p>Model cost per brief<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Portfolio health<\/p><\/td>\n<td><p>Route routine steps cheaper (Gartner portfolio theme)<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n<hr>\n\n<h2 id=\"how-i10x-helps-research\">How i10X helps research workflows<\/h2>\n<p>i10X is built as an AI workspace where multi-step work can keep context, use more than one model path, and leave a trail for human review. For product framing of multi-step workspaces, see\n<a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/what-is-the-i10x-superagent-your-ai-workspace-that-works-while-you-sleep\">What is the i10X Superagent?<\/a>.\nFair positioning: research-native search tools may still win pure web discovery; scholarly databases still win formal literature review; i10X is strongest when you need protocolized multi-model work (draft + adversarial + shared brief) without tab chaos.<\/p>\n<p>Related cluster reading:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/multi-model-ai\">Multi-model AI hub<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/side-by-side-ai-comparison\">Side-by-side AI comparison<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/multi-model-hallucination-checks\">Multi-model hallucination checks<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/best-multi-model-ai-platforms-2026\">Best multi-model AI platforms 2026<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/ai-subscription-stack-cost\">AI subscription stack cost<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<hr>\n\n<h2 id=\"fourteen-day-pilot\">14-day pilot: prove Research Protocol v1<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Days 1-2:<\/strong> Pick three recurring research questions. Write R0 briefs.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Days 3-5:<\/strong> Run R1-R3 with one research-native tool + one general LLM. Store claim tables.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Days 6-8:<\/strong> Add R4 with a second model family. Log high-severity catches.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Days 9-11:<\/strong> Compare against last month\u2019s one-shot research quality (stakeholder score).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Days 12-14:<\/strong> Decide which steps stay multi-model always vs on high-stakes only. Document model IDs and pricing (verify live).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<hr>\n\n<h2 id=\"faq\">Frequently asked questions<\/h2>\n<div class=\"i10x-faq\">\n<p><strong>1. What is the best AI model for research in 2026?<\/strong><br>\nThere is no universal winner. Research-native tools often win discovery; general frontier models often win synthesis when grounded in sources; multi-model workflows win when claims must survive adversarial review. Use Research Protocol v1 instead of a brand loyalty answer.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. Is Perplexity better than ChatGPT for research?<\/strong><br>\nFor many orientation and web-linked tasks, research-native answer engines are faster. For long synthesis on documents you provide, general LLMs are often stronger. Best practice is both in sequence, not a permanent either\/or.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. What is multi-model AI vs multimodal AI?<\/strong><br>\nMulti-model uses multiple models or providers. Multimodal handles multiple media types in one system. Research quality mainly needs multi-model checks plus real sources.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4. Can AI replace a research analyst?<\/strong><br>\nNo. AI accelerates retrieval, structuring, and drafting. Humans own question design, source trust, and external accountability.<\/p>\n<p><strong>5. How do I stop AI from inventing citations?<\/strong><br>\nForbid invented sources in prompts, require claim tables, open every critical URL, and run an adversarial model pass focused on citation problems.<\/p>\n<p><strong>6. Should I use the same model for draft and adversarial check?<\/strong><br>\nPrefer a different model family for independence. Same-model dual prompts are weaker but better than no second pass.<\/p>\n<p><strong>7. How does Gartner\u2019s portfolio idea apply to research?<\/strong><br>\nRoute routine summarization to smaller or cheaper models; reserve stronger models for synthesis and adversarial review. That is portfolio orchestration, not random model hopping.<\/p>\n<p><strong>8. What stats prove model choice matters?<\/strong><br>\ni10X Research found up to a 42 pp hire-rate gap by AI resume style, 1,576 evaluation points, 100 profiles, and a 29-point evaluator score gap. See\n<a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/ai-cv-bias\">the bias study<\/a>.\nDifferent domain, same lesson: model and presentation change outcomes.<\/p>\n<p><strong>9. Is free AI enough for research?<\/strong><br>\nFree tiers can run Protocol v1 for internal drafts. Verify live limits. For client work, check data retention and whether you need a team workspace.<\/p>\n<p><strong>10. How long should Research Protocol v1 take?<\/strong><br>\nOrientation can finish in under an hour. Decision-grade briefs often take longer because R4 and R5 are real work. Measure time-to-approved-brief, not time-to-first-paragraph.<\/p>\n<p><strong>11. Where do agents fit in research?<\/strong><br>\nAgents help when steps are stable and gates exist. Most organizations still experiment more than they scale agents (see\n<a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/ai-agents-experiment-vs-scale\">experiment vs scale<\/a>).\nStart with Protocol v1 before full autonomy.<\/p>\n<p><strong>12. How do I get started on i10X?<\/strong><br>\nOpen\n<a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/\">i10X<\/a>,\nrun one real brief through retrieve \u2192 draft \u2192 adversarial check, and keep the claim table in the workspace. Read the\n<a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/what-is-the-i10x-superagent-your-ai-workspace-that-works-while-you-sleep\">Superagent overview<\/a>\nfor multi-step workspace framing.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n<hr>\n\n<div class=\"i10x-callout i10x-callout--quote\">\n<strong>Key takeaway<\/strong>\n<p><em>&#8220;The best AI model for research is a protocol: retrieve real sources, draft under claim IDs, then make a second model attack the result before a human signs off.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>i10X<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n<hr>\n\n<div class=\"i10x-cta\">\n<h3 id=\"run-research-protocol-on-i10x\">Run Research Protocol v1 in one workspace<\/h3>\n<p>Keep source packs, drafts, and adversarial checks together. Compare models without losing the brief. Humans stay on the publish gate.<\/p>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Open i10X \u2192<\/a>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"i10x-sources\">\n<strong>Sources<\/strong>\n<ol>\n<li>i10X Research, <a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/ai-cv-bias\">AI resume style and multi-model evaluation outcomes<\/a>: up to 42 percentage-point hire-rate gap; 1,576 valid data points; 100 candidate profiles; largest single-evaluator score gap 29 points (June 2026 study framing as published by i10X).<\/li>\n<li>Gartner (March 2026) industry guidance theme: portfolio orchestration of AI models; route routine work to smaller models (qualitative framing for multi-model research ops; verify current Gartner publications for full reports).<\/li>\n<li>LinkedIn Future of Recruiting 2025: about 20% of workweek saved on average among TA professionals using gen AI (productivity context when research is part of hiring or GTM workflows).<\/li>\n<li>Agent adoption gap context via <a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/ai-agents-experiment-vs-scale\">i10X AI agents experiment vs scale<\/a>: McKinsey State of AI 2025 baseline 62% experimenting \/ 23% scaling agentic AI; Gartner 2026 CIO survey 17% deployed AI agents; IBM IBV June 2026 11% of tech leaders fully ready to scale.<\/li>\n<li>i10X product and workspace framing: <a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/\">i10X<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/what-is-the-i10x-superagent-your-ai-workspace-that-works-while-you-sleep\">What is the i10X Superagent?<\/a>; cluster hub <a href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/multi-model-ai\">multi-model AI<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>Category knowledge of research-native answer engines, general frontier LLM chat products, and multi-model aggregators\/routers (Poe, ChatHub, OpenRouter, TypingMind, multi-subscription apps). Features described qualitatively; always verify live pricing and model catalogs.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Find the best AI model for research with Research Protocol v1: retrieve, draft, adversarial check. Perplexity vs general LLMs vs multi-model, plus\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":419,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-398","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-guides"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.8 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Best AI Model for Research: Research Protocol v1 (Retrieve, Draft, Adversarial Check) - i10X Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/best-ai-model-for-research\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Best AI Model for Research: Research Protocol v1 (Retrieve, Draft, Adversarial Check) - i10X Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Find the best AI model for research with Research Protocol v1: retrieve, draft, adversarial check. Perplexity vs general LLMs vs multi-model, plus\u2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/best-ai-model-for-research\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"i10X Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-08-20T07:37:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-20T07:37:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/ai-research-models-abstract-featured.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1536\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"864\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Christopher Ort\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Christopher Ort\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i10x.ai\\\/blog\\\/best-ai-model-for-research#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i10x.ai\\\/blog\\\/best-ai-model-for-research\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Christopher Ort\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i10x.ai\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c5af13ca4e2bbda197660fab76672060\"},\"headline\":\"Best AI Model for Research: Research Protocol v1 (Retrieve, Draft, Adversarial Check)\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-20T07:37:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-08-20T07:37:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i10x.ai\\\/blog\\\/best-ai-model-for-research\"},\"wordCount\":2961,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i10x.ai\\\/blog\\\/best-ai-model-for-research#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i10x.ai\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/ai-research-models-abstract-featured.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"Guides\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/i10x.ai\\\/blog\\\/best-ai-model-for-research#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i10x.ai\\\/blog\\\/best-ai-model-for-research\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i10x.ai\\\/blog\\\/best-ai-model-for-research\",\"name\":\"Best AI Model for Research: Research Protocol v1 (Retrieve, Draft, Adversarial Check) - i10X Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i10x.ai\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i10x.ai\\\/blog\\\/best-ai-model-for-research#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i10x.ai\\\/blog\\\/best-ai-model-for-research#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i10x.ai\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/ai-research-models-abstract-featured.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-20T07:37:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-08-20T07:37:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i10x.ai\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c5af13ca4e2bbda197660fab76672060\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i10x.ai\\\/blog\\\/best-ai-model-for-research#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/i10x.ai\\\/blog\\\/best-ai-model-for-research\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i10x.ai\\\/blog\\\/best-ai-model-for-research#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i10x.ai\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/ai-research-models-abstract-featured.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i10x.ai\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/ai-research-models-abstract-featured.png\",\"width\":1536,\"height\":864,\"caption\":\"Best AI Model for Research: Research Protocol v1 (Retrieve, Draft, Adversarial Check)\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i10x.ai\\\/blog\\\/best-ai-model-for-research#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i10x.ai\\\/blog\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Best AI Model for Research: Research Protocol v1 (Retrieve, Draft, Adversarial Check)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i10x.ai\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i10x.ai\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"i10X Blog\",\"description\":\"Model comparisons, workspace guides, and practical ideas on AI productivity, agents, and multi-model work.\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i10x.ai\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i10x.ai\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c5af13ca4e2bbda197660fab76672060\",\"name\":\"Christopher Ort\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/ea95f3291658df6863df50e0ba53ddde5c83538e2079f4b3b9b548cc92d90cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/ea95f3291658df6863df50e0ba53ddde5c83538e2079f4b3b9b548cc92d90cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/ea95f3291658df6863df50e0ba53ddde5c83538e2079f4b3b9b548cc92d90cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Christopher Ort\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i10x.ai\\\/blog\\\/author\\\/christopher-ort\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Best AI Model for Research: Research Protocol v1 (Retrieve, Draft, Adversarial Check) - i10X Blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/best-ai-model-for-research","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Best AI Model for Research: Research Protocol v1 (Retrieve, Draft, Adversarial Check) - i10X Blog","og_description":"Find the best AI model for research with Research Protocol v1: retrieve, draft, adversarial check. Perplexity vs general LLMs vs multi-model, plus\u2026","og_url":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/best-ai-model-for-research","og_site_name":"i10X Blog","article_published_time":"2026-08-20T07:37:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-20T07:37:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1536,"height":864,"url":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/ai-research-models-abstract-featured.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Christopher Ort","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Christopher Ort","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/best-ai-model-for-research#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/best-ai-model-for-research"},"author":{"name":"Christopher Ort","@id":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/c5af13ca4e2bbda197660fab76672060"},"headline":"Best AI Model for Research: Research Protocol v1 (Retrieve, Draft, Adversarial Check)","datePublished":"2026-08-20T07:37:45+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-20T07:37:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/best-ai-model-for-research"},"wordCount":2961,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/best-ai-model-for-research#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/ai-research-models-abstract-featured.png","articleSection":["Guides"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/best-ai-model-for-research#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/best-ai-model-for-research","url":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/best-ai-model-for-research","name":"Best AI Model for Research: Research Protocol v1 (Retrieve, Draft, Adversarial Check) - i10X Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/best-ai-model-for-research#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/best-ai-model-for-research#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/ai-research-models-abstract-featured.png","datePublished":"2026-08-20T07:37:45+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-20T07:37:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/c5af13ca4e2bbda197660fab76672060"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/best-ai-model-for-research#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/best-ai-model-for-research"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/best-ai-model-for-research#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/ai-research-models-abstract-featured.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/ai-research-models-abstract-featured.png","width":1536,"height":864,"caption":"Best AI Model for Research: Research Protocol v1 (Retrieve, Draft, Adversarial Check)"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/best-ai-model-for-research#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Best AI Model for Research: Research Protocol v1 (Retrieve, Draft, Adversarial Check)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/","name":"i10X Blog","description":"Model comparisons, workspace guides, and practical ideas on AI productivity, agents, and multi-model work.","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/c5af13ca4e2bbda197660fab76672060","name":"Christopher Ort","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ea95f3291658df6863df50e0ba53ddde5c83538e2079f4b3b9b548cc92d90cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ea95f3291658df6863df50e0ba53ddde5c83538e2079f4b3b9b548cc92d90cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ea95f3291658df6863df50e0ba53ddde5c83538e2079f4b3b9b548cc92d90cca?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Christopher Ort"},"url":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/author\/christopher-ort"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/398","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=398"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/398\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":420,"href":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/398\/revisions\/420"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/419"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=398"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=398"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/i10x.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=398"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}