Section
Studies – Page 5
AI and LLM research papers, explained: what each study shows, how solid the evidence is and what it means in practice.
FilterCompanies & models
More stories
-

“Very Seen, But Still Very Alone”: How Chatbots Become Emotional Support
A nine-month study following 18 U.S. adults finds emotional reliance on ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini grows out of practical use, and that model updates can disrupt…
-

A Simple Warning Cuts AI Political Persuasion by Half, Experiments Show
Two preregistered experiments with 3,208 Americans: a short warning that chatbots can be prompted to persuade reduced belief change by 48.1%, without lowering trust in AI…
-

AI Closes Three-Quarters of the Education Gap in a Work Task, Experiment Finds
A randomized experiment with 1,174 adults in Argentina finds a GPT-4.1 assistant shrinks the performance gap between lower- and higher-educated workers from 0.548 to 0.139 standard…
-

How Companies Really Use ChatGPT Enterprise: Big Firms First, Juniors Most
An OpenAI working paper links ChatGPT Enterprise usage to 1,500+ organizations and 17M+ messages: early adopters are far larger firms, and early-career staff send the most…
-

Coding Agents Fix More Bugs When Shown Whole Files, Study Finds
A UIUC study of 300 real GitHub issues finds coding agents resolve more bugs when shown a few whole, verbatim files than with prompt compressors or…
Editor's picks
- Tampered ML: Even the Best AI Models Miss One in Five Planted Research Flaws
- Realistic MCP Faults Halve Agent Quality, and a Bigger Model Doesn’t Help
- Copilot Users Collaborate More, Not Less: Study of 12,000 Employees
- LLM Reviewers Send 76% of Published Top-Journal Papers Back, Yet Miss Most Planted Flaws

